<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>World Models | Ravid Shwartz-Ziv</title><link>https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/tag/world-models/</link><atom:link href="https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/tag/world-models/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>World Models</description><generator>Source Themes Academic (https://sourcethemes.com/academic/)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>World Models and Predictive Representations</title><link>https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/research/world-models/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/research/world-models/</guid><description>&lt;p>World models learn useful structure about how an environment changes. The goal is not simply to generate a realistic next frame. A useful model should support prediction, planning, and action in a representation where the important dynamics are easier to learn and reason about.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>My work in this area asks three related questions:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>What should a model predict so that its representation captures the structure needed for downstream decisions?&lt;/li>
&lt;li>How should we evaluate a world model beyond visual realism or a single probing task?&lt;/li>
&lt;li>When an agent learns from imagined trajectories, how do errors in learned dynamics and rewards affect policy optimization?&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h2 id="related-research">Related research&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>
&lt;a href="https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/publication/training-in-imagination/">On Training in Imagination&lt;/a>&lt;/strong> directly studies policies trained on trajectories produced by learned dynamics and reward models. It analyzes how model error, regularity, sampling, and noisy rewards shape return estimates and optimization.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The broader program also includes joint-embedding predictive architectures. &lt;strong>
&lt;a href="https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/publication/s-jepa/">S-JEPA&lt;/a>&lt;/strong> learns predictive speech representations with soft targets, while &lt;strong>
&lt;a href="https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/publication/hp-jepa/">HP-JEPA&lt;/a>&lt;/strong> studies latent prediction over graphs at multiple resolutions. These are representation-learning systems relevant to the world-model agenda; they are not presented as complete environment simulators.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>My background in information theory and computational neuroscience shapes how I approach these systems: a representation should retain the information needed for prediction and action while exposing dynamics in a form that models can use efficiently.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
&lt;a href="https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/publication/">See all publications&lt;/a> or
&lt;a href="https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/#contact">share a research idea&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>On Training in Imagination</title><link>https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/publication/training-in-imagination/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 12:51:32 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.ravid-shwartz-ziv.com/publication/training-in-imagination/</guid><description/></item></channel></rss>